From the Piece: At the École Normale, Derrida had been an “admiring and grateful disciple” of Foucault. But after building a momentum of his own, he resolved to part from the master by reneging him in public. The occasion was a lecture on the relation between Descartes and the history of madness. This took place in the mid-sixties.Directing his attack against Madness and Civilization, Derrida argued that to let “madness speak for itself” was the “maddest aspect [of Foucault’s] project.” He had admired his teacher’s attempt to give Madness a voice, but to have given Madness, in the end, the tongue of logic was, in truth, to betray the very cause of the sacred insanity. Because Folly, as they all knew, was silent.
And, truly, Derrida inveighed, it is when we want “to speak the madmen’s silence that we pass over to the side of the enemy, to the side of order, even if, within order, we fight it and question its origin.” This wasn’t a disavowal of the Bataillean project, of course. It seemed rather a polemic driven by envy and rivalry (3 pp).
Unpublished excerpt from Chapter 7 of The Ideology of Tyranny (2006)
Purchases are made via Paypal using your Paypal account or major credit card. Once you submit your payment, you will be directed to the download page where you can read and save the full essay.